SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 979

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Baldev Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Nazar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.

1. Baldev Kaur widow, Bhajanjit Kaur minor daughter, Harkirat Singh minor son and Ind Kaur mother of Onkar Singh deceased filed Claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the grant of compensation to the tune of Rupees twenty lacs on account of death of Onkar Singh son of Shri Harnek Singh, in Motor Vehicular accident.

2. The case of appellant as pleaded in their claim petition is that on 22-10-1989, Bharat Harvestor Combine belonging to respondents No. 2 to 5 was engaged for harvesting paddy crop in the fields of Jugraj son of Shri Ujjal Singh. The same got stuck in the field and in order to pull it out, five tractors were engaged. One of those tractors was of Harnek Singh on which Onkar Singh deceased was sitting. The other tractors belonged to Kaur Singh, Jugraj Singh, Jana Singh, Harminder Singh and Harwinder Singh. The driver of combine was Nazar Singh, respondent No. 1. While the tractor were pulling out Combine, the driver of the same rashly and negligently drove it and struck against an electric wire, as a result of which electric current passed in the Harvestor Combine and thereafter in all the tractors. As a result





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top