SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 922

K.S.KUMARAN
Amarjit Kaur W/o Sartaz Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sartaz Singh S/o Gurcharan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner-Amarjit Kaur filed a petition under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the respondent-Sartaz Singh on the file of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jagadhari, claiming maintenance @ Rs. 1000/- per month. She alleged that she was married to respondent on 19-11-1989 and that soon after the marriage, the respondent started maltreating her on the ground that she had not brought sufficient dowry. She further alleged that on 23-7-1990 she was beaten by the respondent and was driven out of the house. According to the petitioner, she has since then been living with her brother and that the respondent never cared for her and also refused to resume matrimonial relationship with her. The petitioner further claimed that she had no source of income to maintain herself. The respondent appeared through counsel and made a statement that he has no objection if a sum of Rs. 300/- per month was fixed as maintenance. Accordingly, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate awarded the petitioner Rs. 300/- permensem as maintenance payable by the respondent from the date of filing of the petition.

2. The respondent who did not have any objection to the award to the mainte










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top