SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 824

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Jawahar Lal Gupta and M.L.Koul JJ.
Shastri Nagar-kanchghar Sudhar Sabha
Versus
State Of Haryana
Civil Writ Petition No. 5353 of 1995,
Decided On : MAY 16, 1996

In the absence of any evidence of objectionable pollution caused by the mill, the court declined to order its closure.

Headnote:

ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION - AIR AND WATER POLLUTION - OIL MILL - CLOSURE - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - FACTORIES ACT, 1948 - SECTION 2(g) - EXPLOSIVES ACT, 1884 - SECTION 5 - HARYANA MUNICIPAL ACT, 1973 - SECTION 158 - HARYANA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD ACT, 1975 - SECTION 31A(a), A(b) AND 33-A(a), A(b) - CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 - ARTICLE 226 - WRIT PETITION - AIR AND WATER POLLUTION CAUSED BY OIL MILL - CLOSURE OF MILL - PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION - LEGAL PROVISIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS - COURT'S DECISION.

Fact of the Case:

A writ petition was filed in public interest alleging that an oil mill was causing air and water pollution in a residential area. The petitioner sought a direction to close down the mill. The mill was established without obtaining consent from the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB) and was discharging trade effluent without any treatment. The mill also had not provided any air pollution control measures.

Finding of the Court:

The court appointed a Local Commissioner to inspect the mill premises and submit a report. The report found that there was no visible air or water pollution caused by the mill. The mill was using a sealed container to heat oil and the by-product was spent earth which was collected and sold. The dirty water settled at one side of the factory was due to domestic sewerage of the colony. The mill had also installed a chimney of sufficient height to disperse the smoke.

Issues: 1. Whether the oil mill was causing air and water pollution? 2. Whether the mill should be closed down?

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the mill was not causing any objectionable pollution. The report of the Local Commissioner and the absence of any evidence to the contrary supported this finding. The court also noted that the HSPCB had not filed any objections to the mill's operation. Therefore, the court dismissed the writ petition.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition and declined to order the closure of the oil mill.

Judgment

JAWAHAR LAL GUPTA, J.

1. The petitioner prays for the issue of a writ and mandamus directing Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 to take appropriate action for closing down the,Oil Mills being run by Respondent No. 6. A few facts may be noticed.

2. The petitioner is a Society of the residents of the Shastri Nagar, Ambala City. It has filed the present writ petition in public interest. The petitioner alleges that the Shastri Nagar "is in existence since 1960 in the Ambala City". Initially, a separate industrial area had been carved out. In the year 1994, Swastik Oil Mill, Hissar Road was installed in the vicinity of the residential area. According to the petitioner, respondent No. 6 had set up the Oil Mill in an unauthorised manner on account of its influence and political connections. It is further alleged that boilers of huge capacity and volume have been installed in the factory premises "which could be fatal for the residents......" According to the petitioner, no licence under the Explosives Act had been obtained by Respondent No. 6. The Mill releases gases full of foul smell polluting the whole atmosphere. The Boilers release gassteam with very loud noise throughout the day and night and vapours of the steam engulf the whole atmosphere like clouds. Poisonous gaseous substances which irritate the eyes and lead to respiratory problems are released. As a result, the residents find it difficult to breathe in open air. These disturb the life of the residents of the locality. It has been further alleged that the Mill has thrown mud on the municipal passage and blocked the drainage of the area. As a consequence, dirty water has accumulated on the passage near the Mill. A pond has been formed on the shallow land. The drainage made by the Municipal Committee has been blocked. It remains full of filthy water. It can cause diseases in the area. The effluent discharged by the Mill pollutes the drinking water. The residents of the area made complaints to the official respondents and requested them to stop the further functioning of the factory. Respondents Nos. 1 to 5 having failed to take any action, the petitioner has approached this Court through the present writ petition. The petitioner maintains that the Mill has been established without taking care of the ecology. In pursuance to the complaint submitted by the petitioner, Respondent No. 3, the Director, Department of Industries had called the petitioner on Oct. 20, 1994. The representative of the Society had appeared before the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Ambala a number of times but nothing fruitful was done. The respondents have failed to carry out their constitutional and legal duties. Consequently, the petitioner prays for the issue of a direction restraining respondent No. 6 from running the factory.

3. Separate written statements have been filed by different respondents. In the written statement filed on behalf of the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (Respondent No. 2), it has been inter alia mentioned that the Unit was established without obtaining consent. Letters dated Sept. 2, 1994 and May 3, 1995 had been written to respondent No. 6 to apply for consent. Since the Unit had not applied of consent, it had been declared as a nonapplicant. Allegations of connivance with or favouritism to the Unit have been denied. It has been further pointed out that the Deputy Commissioner, Ambala has been requested to initiate action under sec. 133, Cr.P.C. against the Unit. Action under Sections 31A(a), A(b) and 33-A(a), A(b) has been initiated against the Unit by directing the Haryana State Electricity Board to disconnect the electric supply. Copies of the communications addressed to respondent No. 6 and the Board etc, have also been produced with the written statement.

4. In the written statement filed on behalf of respondent No. 5 a Municipal Committee, it has been inter alia stated that the Mill was established without obtaining any permission and as such, it has


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top