SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 834

G.S.SINGHVI, S.S.SUDHALKAR
Sukhbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana And Ors. – Respondent


Judgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. A short but important point which arises for determination in this case is whether the expression "the members of the Committee" used in Section 21 of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) would include the members nominated by the Government under Section 9(3) of the Act. An ancillary question which would need determination relates to the effect of amendment made in Section 9(3) by the Haryana Municipal (Amendment) Ordinance, 1995 and the Haryana Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1995.

2. Before we deal with the above mentioned questions, it would be useful to refer to the facts on which the parties are not in serious dispute. Petitioner, Sukhbir Singh, was elected as Municipal Commissioner of Municipal Committee, Gharaunda, in December, 1994. He was elected as Vice President of the Municipal Committee, Gharaunda, on 24.2.1995. On a requisition given by some of the members of the Municipal Committee,, Gharaunda, to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, under Section 21 of the act read with Rule 72-A of the Haryana Municipal Election Rules, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules), the Deputy Commissioner appointed the Sub-Divisional

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top