SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 642

R.P.SETHI, S.S.NIJJAR
Master Aman Preet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Government Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. Basing their rights as originating from the preamble of the Constitution and alleging violation of Articles 25 and 29, this Public Interest Litigation has been filed for issuance of appropriate directions for deleting the alleged derrogatory remarks regarding Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth Guru of Sikhs, as have been incorporated at page 19 in the book "Modern India, A History Text Book for Class XII, Third Edition", published by National Council of Educational Research and Training (in short called as "NCERI"). The aforesaid book is prescribed in the schools of Central Board of Secondary Education (in short "CBSE) pattern throughout India and is authored by Shri Bipan Chandra, respondent No. 3.

2. It is alleged that the offending remarks are factually incorrect and intended to hurt the religious feelings of the Sikhs, who have rightly been claimed to be a part and parcel of the Indian polity.

3. The writ petition has been initiated at the instance of petitioner No. 1, who is a student of History, Class XII and petitioner No. 2, who claims to be a renowned poet of Punjabi, involved in constant research of Sikh history and particularly the life of Sikh Gurus. He claims to h






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top