SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 519

P.K.JAIN
Mahi Pal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. Mahi Pal and Amar Pal Singh, petitioners, have filed this petition under Section. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for quashing F.I.R. No.15 dated 28-12-1992, registered under Sections 468, 471, 420 and 120-B, I. P. C., by the State Vigilance Bureau, Hissar, and the consequent charge-sheet filed under Section 173 of the Code and pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhiwani.

2. The back-drop of the case runs like this. In pursuance of an advertisement dated 15-1-1986 made by the Haryana Public Service Commission, Mahi Pal had applied for one of the three temporary posts of Traffice Manager Class-II in the Transport Department, Haryana. Academic qualification under the "essential qualifications" prescribed for the post was Graduate of a recognised University withthree years experience in Motor Road Transport and adequate knowledge of Hindi. Mahi Pal petitioner along with others was interviewed by the said Public Service Commission on 3-9-1986. Result was declared on 10-9-1986. The name of Mahi Pal petitioner was recommended by the said Commission to the State Government for appointment to the post of Traffic Manager,
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top