SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 269

T.H.B.CHALAPATHI
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

T.H.B.Chalapathi, J.

1. The appellants are partners of firm M/s Mangat Ram & Sons, Faridkot, On 27.6.1984 the Chief Agricultural Officer visited the shop of the appellants and found that they were in possession of 273 bags of NFL fertilizer. Then the Chief Agricultural Office took a sample of the fertilizer from a bag and divided the sample into four equal portions and sent one sample to the laboratory for analysis. The Analyst found that the sample was deficient in respect of Nitrogen and Amonical Nitrogen and therefore, a case was registered in FIR No. 135 dated 8.11.1984, Police Station, Kotwali Faridkot under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 and a charge sheet was filed in the Court of Presiding Officer, Special Court, Faridkot against the accused. The learned Presiding Officer, Special Court took the case in file in Case No. 4 of 1985. In order to prove the guilt of the accused, the prosecution examined the witnesses and marked certain documents. After closure of the prosecution evidence, the accused was examined under Section 313 Cr. P.C, wherein they stated that they had purchased the fertilizer from National Fertilizer Ltd., Nangal Unit which is a Gov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top