SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 242

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Basant Rani – Appellant
Versus
Ran Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.

1. Smt. Basant Rani and her minor daughter had filed a claim petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicle Act claiming Rs. 3,00,000/- as compensation on account of death of Suresh Kumar, husband of the claimant No. 1 who died in an accident caused due to rash and negligent driving of Ran Singh, driver of Bus No. DEP-3737. The Bus was owned by respondent No. 2, Krishan Bus Service, Delhi-Hisar Transport Co. (P) Ltd. and was insured with the New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

2. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Rohtak vide its award dated 20.2.1985 had dismissed the claim petition by holding that the accident was not caused due to rash and negligent driving of driver of the Bus. However, the Tribunal had assessed the income of the deceased at Rs. 1,000/- per month and after deducting 1/4 from the income of the deceased as his personal expenses, assessed the dependency of the claimants on the deceased at Rs. 750/- i.e. Rs. 9,000/- per annum. By applying a multiplier of 16, the claimants were held entitled to Rs. 1,44,000/-as compensation on account of death of Suresh Kumar. The liability to pay compensation was fastened on the Insurance Company. Howev






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top