SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 193

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Manjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Dadra – Respondent


Judgment

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.

1. Manjit Singh had filed a claim petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, claiming compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a road accident. The claimant had also filed an application for condonation of delay in filing the claim petition. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar vide its order dated 23.8.1987 dismissed the application for condonation of delay as well as claim petition.

2. Aggrieved against it, the claimant has filed the present appeal.

3. The accident had occurred on 23.1.1986 and the limitation for filing the claim petition expired on 23.7.1986. There was delay of 37 days fin filing the claim petition.

4. This Court is of the view that the Tribunal should have condoned the delay of 37 days as the same was duly explained by the petitioner. The approach of the Tribunal on the question of limitation should be liberal. The motor Accident Claims Tribunal is a social legislature, the object of which is to compensate the dependents of the deceased and also to compensate the person who suffers injuries in the road accident.

5. For the reasons stated above, the order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalandha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top