SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 1080

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Naresh Jain, J.
Bhartu
Versus
State Of Haryana
Regular First Appeal No. 1949 of 1991,
Decided On : DECEMBER 21, 1994

The compensation payable to the landowners for the acquisition of Gair Mumkin Pahar land and trees is Rs. 4040/- per acre.

Headnote:

LAND ACQUISITION - COMPENSATION - TREES - VALUATION - Gair Mumkin Pahar Land - Compensation for trees - Valuation of trees - Principles.

Fact of the Case:

The State of Haryana acquired 533 acres of land in village Kathgarh for a public purpose, namely, for forest plantation. The Land Acquisition Collector assessed the compensation for the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 1600/- per acre. Dissatisfied with the Award of the Land Acquisition Collector, the landowners sought references under Section 18 of the Act. On reference, the learned District Judge, Ambala, has determined the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3100/- per acre. Aggrieved against the Award of the learned District Judge, Ambala, the landowners have filed these appeals.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the acquired land was Gair Mumkin Pahar and unfit for cultivation. The court also found that the landowners had been able to prove the plantation of trees by them. The court held that the landowners were entitled to the grant of Rs. five lakhs for the acquisition of trees and for the entire acquired and which is 533 acres. The compensation per acre comes to Rs. 938/- approximately which can be rounded off at Rs. 940/- per acre. The amount of Rs. 940/- on addition to Rs. 3100/-, the compensation payable to the landowners both for the acquired land and the trees comes to Rs. 4040/- per acre.

Issues: 1. Whether the grant of compensation at the rate of Rs. 3100/- per acre is just, fair and reasonable? 2. Whether the landowners are entitled to the grant of compensation for the trees, which according to them, were standing at the time of acquisition.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the acquired land was Gair Mumkin Pahar and unfit for cultivation. The court also found that the sale deeds relied upon by the landowners and the State did not have any direct bearing on the market value of the acquired land. The court held that the acquired Gair Mumkin Pahar Land deserves to be evaluated at the same rate both on the basis of decision taken is Ram Singhs case (supra) and on the ground that Banjar Kadim land and Gair Mumkin Pahar land were not fit for cultivation. 2. The court held that the landowners had been able to prove the plantation of trees by them. The court also found that the trees were more than 20 years of age. The court held that the landowners were entitled to the grant of Rs. five lakhs for the acquisition of trees and for the entire acquired and which is 533 acres. The compensation per acre comes to Rs. 938/- approximately which can be rounded off at Rs. 940/- per acre.

Final Decision: The appeals filed by the appellant-landowners are allowed to the extent indicated above with proportionate costs. They would also have all the benefits of the amended provisions of sections 23 (1-A), 23(2) and 28 of the Act.

Judgment

N.C.Jain, J.

1. This judgment of mine would dispose of Regular First Appeal Nos. 1949 to 1961 of 1991 and 2154 of 1992 filed by the landowners against the Award of the District Judge, Ambala, dated 12.3.1991. All the appeals arise out of common notification and common Award.

2. The State of Haryana in pursuance of notification dated 16.12.1980 issued under Section 4 of the land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), acquired land measuring 533 acres, situated in village Kathgarh, Tehsil, Jagadhri District Yamuna Nagar. The aforesaid land was acquired for a public purpose, namely, for forest plantation. The land Acquisition Collector by his Award dated 18.6.1986, assessed the compensation for the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 1600/per acre. Dissatisfied with the Award of the Land Acquisition Collector, the landowners sought references under Section 18 of the Act. On reference, the learned District Judge, Ambala, has determined the market value of the acquired land at the rate of Rs. 3100/- per acre. Aggrieved against the Award of the learned District Judge, Ambala, the landowners have filed these appeals.

3. In these appeals two questions arise. They are whether the grant of compensation at the rate of Rs. 3100/- per acre is just, fair and reasonable and whether the landowners are entitled to the grant of compensation for the trees, which according to them, were standing at the time of acquisition. In order to appreciate the aforesaid questions, it is necessary to have a look at the oral and documentary evidence brought on the record of the case.

4. The landowners produced six witnesses whereas the State has produced one witness. Apart from the oral evidence, the landowners produced Exh. P1 Aks-shajra, Ex. P2 the report of the Local Commissioner mentioning the number of trees, P3 the plan showing the trees of various kinds i.e. Chhal etc. Exhs. P4 and P5 evidencing the payment of some money, Exhs. PA, PB, PC copies of sale deeds Exhs. PD, PE and PF copies of the mutations and Exhs PC and PH copies of the jamabandis. The State of Haryana in addition to the production of R.W.I. Krishan Kumar Patwari of the office of the Deputy Conservator of Forests Ambala also produced Ex. R1 the index map showing the. acquired land in green colour, copies of the sale deeds Exhs R2 to R6 and R.7 the gist of the sale transactions.

PW. 1 Kamlesh Singla Clerk Tehsil Office Jagadhri stated that Mehar Singh Contractor took in auction Som Nadi in village Kathgarh regarding gold (probably he means minerals).

PW. 2 Naib Singh Patwari stated that village Kathgarh was in his revenue circle and that he bad seen the signature on the Aks-shajra of the previous Patwari Balwant Singh which was prepared by him. He claims to have seen the nature of the land which was uneven. Khasra Nos. 52/14 and 78/3, 4/1 and 4/2, according to him, was near the acquired land. Khasra No. 146 was situated at a distance of 6-7 acres away from the acquired land. In cross-examination he was constrained to admit that the entire acquired land was Gair Mumkin Pahar and was unfit for cultivation. The acquired land, according to him, suffered erosion due to the flow of water from the Hilly area. He further stated that the Forest Department did plantation over the acquired land. He volunteered to say that plantation was already there. He further admitted in cross-examination that he had not seen the acquired land prior to his posting as Patwari i.e. before September 1990. Village Kathgarh, according to him, was situated at a distance of 8-10 killas from the acquired land.

PW. 3 Kartar Singh claims to have seen the Forest of Kathgarh. He stated that he had seen there trees of Chhal, Jingan, Khair, Sain, Cheer, Chilly, Chilla, Dhakran, Kikkar, Sheesham, Neem, Neor, Jhanjhera. die stated that he had seen and counted the trees for four days. He is stated to have prepared the site plan Exh. P3. He proved his report regarding the counting of trees Exh. P.2. He also cla










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top