SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 862

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
G.C.Garg, J.
Niranjan Kumar
Versus
Veena Rani
First Appeal Order No. 7 of 1993,
Civil Miscellaneous No. 10423 of 1994,
Decided On : OCTOBER 11, 1994

The court has the discretion to allow the conversion of a petition for dissolution of marriage by mutual consent and waive the statutory period of six months based on the settlement between the parties and the absence of reconciliation.

Headnote:

Divorce - Mutual Consent - Conversion of petition Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act into a petition Under Section 13-B - The court allowed the conversion of the petition and dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent by waiving the statutory period of six months.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant filed a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. During the hearing, a compromise and a joint application under Section 13-B of the Act were presented, seeking a decree of divorce by mutual consent.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the parties had been living separately for about three years, had settled the matters concerning the marriage, and had no chance of reconciliation. It allowed the conversion of the petition and dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent, waiving the statutory period of six months.

Issues: Conversion of petition Under Section 13 into a petition Under Section 13-B, dissolution of marriage by mutual consent, waiving of the statutory period of six months.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the settlement between the parties, the absence of reconciliation, and the fact that the parties had been living separately for about three years in allowing the conversion of the petition and waiving the statutory period of six months for the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent.

Final Decision: The court allowed the conversion of the petition Under Section 13 into a petition Under Section 13-B and dissolved the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent, waiving the statutory period of six months. The wife was deemed to have no further claim against the appellant.

Judgment

G.C.Garg, J.

1. Niranjan Kumar, appellant herein filed petition Under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short the Act against the respondent for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty. His petition was dismissed by judgment and decree dated October 24, 1992 and this is how the present appeal came to be filed. On January 12, 1993, the appeal was admitted for final hearing.

2. During the course of hearing of Civil Misc. 10423/C.II of 1994, learned Counsel for the parties presented before me not only a compromise entered into between the parties, duly signed by them, but also a joint application purporting to be one under Section 13-B of the Act again duly signed by the parties for granting a decree of divorce by mutual consent. It was prayed therein that statutory period of six months as required under Section 13-B(2) of the Act be condoned having regard to the facts and circumstances of the present case, especially the one that the petition Under Section 13 of the Act had been filed more than three years prior to the filing of this application. Statements of the appellant as also the respondent present in Court were recorded separately. Niranjan Kumar, appellant stated that he had been living separately from his wife, respondent herein, for the last more than three years and during this period they have not lived together and that he has now settled the dispute in terms of compromise Exhibit D.1. He further stated that his petition Under Section 13 may be converted into a petition Under Section 13-B of the Act and marriage between the parties be dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. It was also stated by him that all articles of dowry and Istri Dhan have been returned to the respondent-wife, besides a sum of Rs. 30,000/- has also been paid to her on account of permanent alimony. He stated that petition Under Section 13-B of the Act is duly signed by him as also the respondent.

3. The respondent-wife by making her statement accepted the statement of the appellant-husband as correct.

4. On a consideration of the matter arid having regard to the fact that the parties have been living separately for the last about three years, I am satisfied that the parites have decided to dissolve the marriage by a decree of divorce by mutual consent and that there is no chance of reconciliation and it is not possible for them to live together as husband and wife. No useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition for divorce by mutual consent pending for a period of six months and the interest of justice requires that marriage between the parties be dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent by waiving the period of six months. The parites have also settled out of Court the matters concerning the marriage including return of dowry articles and lump sum payment of permanent alimony.

5. Thus, having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, petition Under Section 13 of the Act is converted into a petition Under Section 13-B which is hereby allowed and the marriage between the parties is dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent. The office shall assign number to the petition Under Section 13-B of the Act.

6. The net result is that petition Under Section 13-B of the Act jointly filed by the parties is accepted and marriage between the parties is dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent by waiving of the period of six months. The wife will have no further claim against the appellant. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top