G.S.SINGHVI
Jagdish Chand – Appellant
Versus
Labour Commissioner – Respondent
G. S. Singhvi, J.
1. The petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of mandamus to the respondents to comply with the award dated May 24, 1993 passed by the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon, in Reference Case No.284 of 1989. Another prayer made by the petitioner is for issue of a direction to respondent No.1 to sanction prosecution of respondent Nos.2 and 3 for non-compliance of the award of the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court.
2. In short, the case of the petitioner is that while he was serving as a Helper on daily wages in the service of the Haryana Tourism Corporation Limited, the employer terminated his service with effect from November 30, 1988 without holding a proper and fair enquiry in accordance with the principles of natural justice, He raised a dispute against the termination of his service. The Government made a reference to the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Gurgaon. After considering the rival cases, the Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court held that the termination of the service of the workman (Petitioner) was illegal and unjustified and that he was entitled to be reinstated in service with continuity of service and full back wages. T
D.K. Yadav V/s. J.M.C. Industries Ltd.
Olga Tellis V/s. Bombay Municipal Corporation
State Of Maharashtra V/s. Chandrabhan Tale
Cooper s Case, Air 1970 Sc 564; P.N. Dua V/s. P. Shiv Shankar
Delhi Transport Corporation V/s. Dtc Mazdoor Congress And Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.