A.P.CHOWDHRI, J.L.GUPTA
Bharat Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
A.P.Chowdhri, J.
1. The vires of sections 37 and 38 of the Haryana General Sales-Tax Act, 1973, as amended by the Haryana General Sales-Tax (second Amendment and Validation) Act, 1983 (Haryana Act No. 3 of 1983) is the common question which arises in these writ petitions. The facts giving rise to this question in CWP Nos. 2670, 2674 and 3810 of 1983 are substantially identical. The facts in CWP No. 4775 of 1986 are slightly different and will be adverted to at the appropriate stage.
2. It will be convenient to briefly mention the facts in CWP No. 2670 of 1983.
3. The petitioner is a contractor appointed to carry on Railway Booking Agency at Rewari in the State of Haryana. As such contractor he books goods and issues tickets on behalf of the Indian Railway. He also arranges delivery of the goods received from other stations. By the Haryana General Sales-Tax (Second Amendment and Validation) Act, 1983 sections 37 and 38 of the principal Act have been amended. Under the Principal Act, a contractor of Railway Booking Agency was not required to obtain any licence under the provisions of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973, nor was he required to submit any return of the tran
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.