SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 557

V.K.BALI
Ram Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayer is for quashing of notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act issued on 23.2.1989 and 22.2.1990 respectively.

2. The grounds that have been pressed for quashing notifications aforesaid, inter alia, are that the plan produced in the Court vide orders passed by this Court in this behalf would clearly demonstrate that the land has been acquired in such a manner that after leaving the unacquired area or exempted portion, the remaining one cannot be put to any meaningful use as also that a committee of five members was constituted to go into the question after visiting the spot as to which land should be exempted from array of acquisition and that the report of the Committee had influenced the mind of the Land Acquisition Collector while deciding objections under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act.

3. This Court after perusing the material placed on record and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties is not impressed with either of the arguments mentioned above: The land, subject matter of acquisition, so far as the petitioners are concerned, is 8 Bighas and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top