V.K.BALI
Ram Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
V.K.Bali, J.
1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayer is for quashing of notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act issued on 23.2.1989 and 22.2.1990 respectively.
2. The grounds that have been pressed for quashing notifications aforesaid, inter alia, are that the plan produced in the Court vide orders passed by this Court in this behalf would clearly demonstrate that the land has been acquired in such a manner that after leaving the unacquired area or exempted portion, the remaining one cannot be put to any meaningful use as also that a committee of five members was constituted to go into the question after visiting the spot as to which land should be exempted from array of acquisition and that the report of the Committee had influenced the mind of the Land Acquisition Collector while deciding objections under Section 5-A of the Land Acquisition Act.
3. This Court after perusing the material placed on record and after hearing the learned counsel for the parties is not impressed with either of the arguments mentioned above: The land, subject matter of acquisition, so far as the petitioners are concerned, is 8 Bighas and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.