SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 563

V.K.BALI
Siri Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana Through The Secretary To Government Urban Estate – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. Siri Krishan and others through present petition filed by them under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seek a writ in the nature of Certiorari so as to quash notifications dated 23.2.1989 and 22.2.1990 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act respectively. Siri Krishan and others through present petition filed by them under Articles 226 of the Constitution of India seek a writ in the nature of Certiorari so as to quash notifications dated 23.2.1989 and 22.2.1990 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act respectively.

2. The grounds for quashing the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act are many but being convinced that the respondents had taken possession of the land under acquisition in February, 1992 whereas the stay for dispossession was obtained from this Court in March 1992 and Full Bench of this Court in Nirenjan Singh and another v. State of Punjab, (1985-1)87 P.L.R. 358 (F.B.), would not permit the petitioners to challenge the acquisition as such, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners confines the argument to an alternate p5ea raised in the writ petition that the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top