V.K.Jhanji, J.

1. This will dispose of Civil Revision No. 1251 of 1992 as well as C.O.C.P. No. 785 of 1992. Civil Revision has been preferred by the tenant against the order of ejectment passed by the Authorities under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act. The contempt petition has been filed by the landlord on the allegation that the landlord took possession on 24.4.1992 pursuant to the order of ejectment and this Court, on 7.5.1992, while admitting the revision petition, had directed the parties to maintain status-quo with regard to possession, but the tenant on the night intervening 11/12-5-1992 took forcible possession.

2. In brief, the facts are that the premises in dispute were let out to the petitioner for running of ice-cream and ice-factory. Ejectment of the petitioner was sought on the ground, that the tenant has ceased to occupy the premises w.e.f. 1.1.1986 continuously for a period of four months immediately preceding the presentation of the ejectment application, and also on the ground that the tenant has caused damage to the premises by its misuse. The tenant denied the averments made in the ejectment application and stated that he has not ceased to occu