V.K.Bali, J.

1. Kiran Rani, it appears from the facts of this case, has approached this Court through present petition filed by her under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of habeas corpus for recovery of her infant child, Gaurav, aged only one year from the custody of respondents, who are none others than her husband and his relations in compelling circumstances. Petitioner was married with respondent-Krishan Kumar in May, 1992 at Sangrur. Out of this wed-lock a son was born about a year ago. It is pleaded that respondents were not happy with petitioner for not bringing adequate dowry. Consequently, she was made to live with her father at Sangrur alongwith her infant child, Gaurav. Respondents started putting pressure on her as also on her father to get divorce so that respondent-husband was able to solemnise second marriage. This was, obviously, unacceptable to petitioner. It is further pleaded that the respondents hatched a conspiracy and called petitioner alongwith her father to Hoshiarpur in the garb of rehabilitating her. When petitioner alongwith her infant son and father reached at Hoshiarpur at the house of respondents on February 19,199