SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 265

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
V.K.Bali, J.
Kiran Rani
Versus
Krishan Kumar
Criminal Writ Petition No. 105 of 1994,
Decided On : MARCH 1, 1994

In matters concerning the custody of a minor child, the paramount consideration is the welfare of the child.

Headnote:

HABEAS CORPUS - CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILD - WELFARE OF THE CHILD - PARAMOUNT CONSIDERATION - DIVORCE DEED - VALIDITY AND LEGALITY - TO BE DECIDED IN APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, a wife, filed a petition for habeas corpus seeking the custody of her one-year-old son, Gaurav, from the custody of her husband and his relations. Petitioner alleged that she was forced to sign a divorce deed under threat and that her son was forcibly taken from her. Respondents claimed that the divorce deed was executed voluntarily and that the son was given to them as per the terms of the deed.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the paramount consideration in matters concerning the custody of a minor child is the welfare of the child. The court found that the child was of tender age and was living on breast feed, and that the mother was likely to develop physical problems if the child was not returned to her.

Issues: 1. Whether the divorce deed was executed voluntarily or under threat. 2. Whether the child should be given to the mother or the father.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the validity and legality of the divorce deed could not be decided without recording evidence. However, the court found that the child should be immediately handed over to the mother as it was in the best interest of the child.

Final Decision: The court ordered that the child be immediately handed over to the mother and that the question of interim custody be decided within three months from the date the respondent is served in the petition to be filed by the wife.

Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. Kiran Rani, it appears from the facts of this case, has approached this Court through present petition filed by her under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of habeas corpus for recovery of her infant child, Gaurav, aged only one year from the custody of respondents, who are none others than her husband and his relations in compelling circumstances. Petitioner was married with respondent-Krishan Kumar in May, 1992 at Sangrur. Out of this wed-lock a son was born about a year ago. It is pleaded that respondents were not happy with petitioner for not bringing adequate dowry. Consequently, she was made to live with her father at Sangrur alongwith her infant child, Gaurav. Respondents started putting pressure on her as also on her father to get divorce so that respondent-husband was able to solemnise second marriage. This was, obviously, unacceptable to petitioner. It is further pleaded that the respondents hatched a conspiracy and called petitioner alongwith her father to Hoshiarpur in the garb of rehabilitating her. When petitioner alongwith her infant son and father reached at Hoshiarpur at the house of respondents on February 19,1994, the son was forcibly taken from her and she was made to sign certain papers under the threat that if she was not to comply with their directions and sign the documents, her son, Gaurav would be killed. Finding no way out to resist the demand of respondents, who were threatening to kill her son, she succumbed to the pressure and signed certain papers produced before her. Once this object of respondents was achieved, she and her father were pushed out of the house and they were told to leave Hoshiarpur. Respondents further threatened the petitioner that Gaurav would be kept by them as a security for getting divorce from the Court and if she was to resist the decree of divorce, respondents would kill her son. When frantic efforts of petitioner to secure the custody of her only son, both from Hoshiarpur as well as Sangrur police, brought to tangible result, she approached this Court for the relief indicated in the earlier part of this judgment.

2. It is pleaded that the life of infant son Gaurav, is in the danger as the minor is taking breast feed, not being used to take other food. It is also pleaded the petitioner is also feeling complications as the milk is flowing from her breasts and in case Gaurav is not given breast feed of which he is used to, not only that his life would be in danger but petitioner might also be in for some physical trouble on account of continuous flow of milk from her breasts.

3. In pursuance of notice issued to respondents, reply has been filed by them wherein it has been sought to be made out that on July 17, 1993 petitioner told that she had to go to Nanga Mandir/Gurudwara situated at Sangrur as before delivery she made prayer that in case she was blessed with a son, she would have Darshan of Nanga Mandir alongwith her son and other family members. As such, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 alongwith petitioner and her son went to Sangrur. After having Darshan of the Mandir, petitioner insisted to stay at Sangrur with her parents for some time. Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 came back to Hoshiarpur. The allegations regarding demand of dowry have been denied. It has further been pleaded that when after waiting for a long time, petitioner did not turn up, husband-respondent went to Sangrur to bring her back. Petitioner, however, refused to come back without any excuse. Other efforts made by respondents also did not yield any result. On February 15,1994 respondents were summoned in the Police Station Wing dealing with complaints of ladies regarding matrimonial disputes. They approached one Jagdish Saini, who happens to be the President of Bahujan Samaj Party. On reaching Police Station, respondents were asked to settle their dispute with petitioner. Jagdish Saini made request to petitioners father on telephone to come to Hoshiarpur to settl













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top