HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Tarsem Lal – Appellant
Versus
Koer Chand – Respondent
Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J.
1. Tarsem Lal and others filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint dated 18.3.1992 Annexure P-1 and summoning order passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fazilka Annexure P-2 whereby the petitioners were directed to face trial under Section 420 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of this petition are that Koer Chand and Shambhu Nath respondents filed a complaint against the petitioner in the court of Judicial Magistrate IInd Class, Fazilka on the allegations that House No. 3986 situated on Bikaneri Road, Fazilka was owned by Sardi Devi wife of Gurdit Chand. After the death of Sardi Devi the house was inherited by her husband Gurdit Chand and her seven sons and one daughter. Gurdit Chand died and his share was also inherited by his sons and daughter. One of the sons of Sain Dass also expired and Shambhu Nath, his brothers and sisters become owners of his share in the house. Petitioners No. 1 to 6 were co-owners but in connivance with petitioners No. 7 and 8 they sold the house on that they were not exclusive owners of the house an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.