SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 205

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Tarsem Lal – Appellant
Versus
Koer Chand – Respondent


Judgment

Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J.

1. Tarsem Lal and others filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint dated 18.3.1992 Annexure P-1 and summoning order passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Fazilka Annexure P-2 whereby the petitioners were directed to face trial under Section 420 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The brief facts relevant for the disposal of this petition are that Koer Chand and Shambhu Nath respondents filed a complaint against the petitioner in the court of Judicial Magistrate IInd Class, Fazilka on the allegations that House No. 3986 situated on Bikaneri Road, Fazilka was owned by Sardi Devi wife of Gurdit Chand. After the death of Sardi Devi the house was inherited by her husband Gurdit Chand and her seven sons and one daughter. Gurdit Chand died and his share was also inherited by his sons and daughter. One of the sons of Sain Dass also expired and Shambhu Nath, his brothers and sisters become owners of his share in the house. Petitioners No. 1 to 6 were co-owners but in connivance with petitioners No. 7 and 8 they sold the house on that they were not exclusive owners of the house an








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top