SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 218

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
Mohinderjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Parminder Kaur Gill – Respondent


Judgment

1. Parminder Kaur Gill respondent filed a complaint against the petitioners and others for offence under Ss. 494 and 494 read with S. 109, IPC on the allegations that she was married to Sukhdev Singh Gill accused No. 1 in the complaint, about 12 years prior to the filing of the complaint, at Moga by Anand Karj ceremony. She lived with Sukhdev Singh as his wife in Dogar Basti, Faridkot, but no child was born out of this wed lock. Sukhdev Singh practised as an Advocate at Faridkot while she was employed as D.P.E. in Barring College, Batala. She frequently visited Faridkot and sometimes Sukhdev Singh came to Batala. Accused Nos. 3 and 4 i.e. Surinder Singh and Mohinderjit Kaur parents of accused No. 2 were employed as teachers in Education Department at Faridkot and they were well acquainted with her mother who was also posted as a teacher in Government Girls School Faridkot. They knew about her marriage with Sukhdev Singh but in spite of that all the accused after consultations and fully knowing that she was the legally wedded wife of Sukhdev Singh performed marriage of Surinder Jit Kaur accused No. 2 with Sukhdev Singh. The second marriage was performed by Bhagwan Singh Gran





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top