SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 217

AMARJEET CHAUDHARY
Lt. Col. Guriqbal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Communications Limited, (A Government Undertaking) – Respondent


Judgment

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.

1. This judgment of mine will dispose of C.W.P. 8451 and 11504 of 1992 as the facts and law point convassed in both the cases are identical. For the purpose of judgement, the facts have been gathered from Civil Writ Petition No. 8541 of 1992 Lt. Col. Guriqbal Singh v. Punjab Communications Ltd.

2. In this writ petition, the question cropped up for consideration is whether on the completion of the probationary period the services of an officer can be terminated by giving three months notice or pay in lieu thereof, or not?

3. The petitioner was appointed as Deputy Manager vide Order dated 20-7-1990, a copy of which is Annexure P-1 to the writ petition, in the pay scale of Rs. 2400-100-3000-125-3500. the terms of conditions of the appointment were mentioned in the appointment letter. The petitioner was confirmed in the respondent-Company vide order dated 14.12.1991, a copy of which is Annexure P-2 to the writ petition. To the petitioners great dismay, his service were dispensed which vide order dated 29-6-1992, copy of which is Annexure P-4 to the petition by invoking para 3 of the terms and conditions of the appointment letter No. PC1VEx-40-1 dated 20-0



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top