SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 173

G.R.MAJITHIA, S.K.JAIN
Chhaju Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of India – Respondent


Judgment

G.R.Majithia, J.

1. This judgment disposes of Regular Second Appeals Nos. 1148 of 1989 and 970 of 1990 and Civil Revisions No. 3655 and 3656 of 1989, 287 of 1991,589 of 1989 and 2385 of 1992.

2. Regular Second Appeal No. 1148 of 1989 is directed against the judgment and decree of District Judge, Jind affirming , on appeal, those of Additional Senior Subordinate Judge, Jind, passing a decree for recovery of Rs. 1,75,826.90 in favour of State Bank of India, Jind (for short, the Bank) and allowing it to recover future interest at the rate of 11 per cent per annum on the principal sum from the date of filing of the suit till realization.

3. Regular Second Appeal No. 970 of 1990 is directed against the judgment and decree of District Judge, Jind, modifying, on appeal, the judgment and decree of the trial Judge decreeing the suit of the Bank for the recovery of an amount of Rs. 1,48,842.80 and allowing future interest at the rate of 12.5 percent per annum on the amount of Rs 44,300/- from the date of filing of the suit till realization.

4. In civil Revision No. 3655 of 1989, the Executing Court, while allowing the objection petition filed by the judgment-debtor, observed thus:-

"





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top