SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(P&H) 161

HARMOHINDER KAUR SANDHU
D. P. Goel – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Gupta – Respondent


Judgment

Harmohinder Kaur Sandhu, J.

1. Prem Kumar husband of Surinder Gupta respondent worked as a senior Clerk in the office of Executive Engineer, Reservoir Management Division, Bhakra Beas Management Board, Nangal Township and Shri D.P. Goel petitioner was his boss. Ram Chand, father of Prem Kumar had filed some complaints against the officers of Bhakra Beas Management Board for corruption. In order to dissuade Ram Chand from pursuing those complaints Prem Kumar was transferred from Chandigarh to Nangal and in order to further harass him the petitioner directed Shri Jagat Ram head clerk of his office to mark Shri Prem Kumar as absent from duty even though he attended the office. In spite of the fact that Prem Kumar was being marked as absent he continued attending his office and his father was also not dissuaded from pursuing the complaints filed by him which infuriated the petitioner. When Prem Kumar persisted that he should be marked present as he was attending the office regularly the petitioner abused him in the name of his mother and sister and defamed him in the presence of Jagat Ram and his other colleagues. He also threatened him with dire consequences and asked him to l








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top