PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
H.N.Seth and S.S.Kang JJ.
Ram Rattan Shukla
Versus
State Of Punjab
Civil Writ Petition No. 4774 of 1986,
Decided On : DECEMBER 10, 1986
PUNJAB GRAM PANCHAYAT ACT, 1952 - S.10, R.40 - ELECTION TO OFFICE OF SARPANCH - TIME LIMIT - DIRECTORY PROVISION - ELECTION CAN BE HELD BEYOND 60 DAYS.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, an elected Panch of Gram Panchayat, Khizrabad, challenged the election program issued by the Deputy Commissioner for holding an election to fill the vacancy of Sarpanch, arguing that the election could not be held beyond 60 days from the occurrence of the vacancy as per R.40 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Election Rules, 1960.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that R.40 of the Rules is directory and not mandatory, and the election can be held beyond 60 days if the prescribed authority is unable to hold it within the prescribed time due to unforeseen circumstances.
Issues: Whether R.40 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Election Rules, 1960, which prescribes a 60-day time limit for holding an election to fill a casual vacancy in the office of Sarpanch, is mandatory or directory.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the principle that provisions of a statute relating to the performance of a public duty are generally directory and not mandatory, especially when strict compliance would cause injustice or inconvenience to persons who have no control over the public functionary performing the duty.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the Deputy Commissioner's action in issuing the election program was valid and the election could be held beyond 60 days from the occurrence of the vacancy.
1. Pandit Ram Rattan Shukla, petitioner and six others were elected Panches of Gram Panchayat, Khizrabad, Tehsil Kharar, District Ropar in the elections held in 1982. Shri Lal Singh was elected Sarpanch. For having committed various irregularities in the discharge of his duties as Sarpanch, Shri Lal Singh aforementioned was removed from the office of Sarpanch vide order dated July 3, 1986. Shri Lal Singh did not file any appeal and order of his removal became final. However, he died on July 23, 1986. The Block Development and Panchayat Officer summoned a meeting of the Panches of Gram Panchayat, Khizrabad to elect an Acting Sarpanch for August 12, 1986. This meeting was postponed and another meeting was called for August 21, 1986. The meeting was attended by three Panches, apart from the petitioner. Three other Panches did not attend the meeting, nor did the Block Development and Panchayat Officer. The petitioner claims to have been elected as an Acting Sarpanch in that meeting.
2. Deputy Commissioner, Ropar, issued election programme (copy Annexure-P-7 to the writ petition) under R.3(1) of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Election Rules, 1960 (hereinafter called the Rules ) for holding election to the office of Sarpanch by the Gram Sabha. The petitioner challenges this action of the authorities through this writ petition.
3. Shri K.K. Cuccria, Advocate, learned Counsel for the petitioner, has argued that (from) a conjoint reading of S.10 of the Punjab Gram Panchayat Act, 1952 ( the Act for short) and R.40 of the Rules, it is crystal clear that when a vacancy occurs by death, resignation or removal of a Sarpanch, an intimation to that effect shall be given by the Block Development and Panchayat Officer to the Deputy Commissioner, who shall cause the vacancy to be filled within sixty days of the occurrence of the vacancy as for as may be, in accordance with the provisions of the Rules. The limit of sixty days may be extended by the Deputy Commissioner if, in his opinion, there are sufficient grounds far such extension. In the present case, the vacancy for the office of Sarpanch occurred on July 3, 1986, with the removal of Shri Lal Singh, the previous Sarpanch. The election to this office could be held within 60 days thereof. The Deputy Commissioner has not extended the time for holding the elections.
After the lapse of sixty days from the occurrence of the vacancy, no election for the office of Sarpanch can be held in view of the clear mandate of R.40 of the Rules. In the present case, admittedly the notice for holding the election has been given for a date beyond sixty days of the occurrence of vacancy. In support of this contention, the learned counsel has relied upon a single Bench decision of this Court in Tara Chand V/s. State of Haryana, 1968 Cur LJ 470.
4. We are not impressed with this contention of Shri Cuccria. The Punjab Gram Panchayat Act was enacted to provide for better administration in the rural areas of Punjab. It has introduced-democracy at the grass-roots if we may use that expression. Ss. 4 and a empower State Government to constitute a Sabha area and establish a Gram Sabha by name in every Sabha area. Every person who is entered as a voter on the electoral roll of the Legislative Assembly pertaining to the area of such Sabha shall be a member of that Sabha. S.6 prescribes that every Sabha shall, in the prescribed manner, elect from amongst its members a Gram Panchayat consisting of such number of Panches as the Government may determine. The election shall be held in the prescribed manner by secret ballot and direct vote and the candidate securing the highest number of valid votes shall be deemed to have been duly elected. Detailed and elaborate procedure has been laid down by the Rules for the election of Sarpanch and members of the Panchayat and resolution of election disputes. The affairs of the Gram Sabha are entrusted to the Gram Panchayat which has its executive body and whose members are elected by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.