SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(P&H) 292

D.S.TEWATIA
Harchand Singh – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. This regular second appeal at the instance of the legal representatives of the plaintiff, Smt. Chandi, widow of one Harnam Singh, arises out of her suit for possession on the basis of title of the suit property described in the head-note of the plaint as consisting of items A to G .

2. The case set up in the plaint was that her son Amar Singh died on 17-11-1954 without leaving a male issue; that he left behind three daughters, defendants 1 to 3, his wife having predeceased him; that the parties were agriculturists and were in the matter of succession governed by customary law, according to which she was entitled to succeed to the suit property left behind by her son Amar Singh; and that the mutation of inheritance No. 5343 in favour of defendants 1 to 3 was illegal and void and had no legal effect so far as the rights of the plaintiffs were concerned.

3. Defendants 1 to 3 contested the claim of the plaintiff and, inter alia, asserted that at the time of the death their father, they were minors and were entitled to succeed to the estate of their father in preference to their grandmother, the plaintiff. It was also pleaded that in the Court of the Guardian Judge (District




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top