SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(P&H) 176

S.P.GOYAL, PRITPAL SINGH
Raksha Rani – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal – Respondent


Judgment

PRITPAL SINGH, J.

1. Ram Rakha was owner of the property in dispute consisting of 1/12th share in land measuring 12 Kanals 3 Marlas, a residential house, a workshop and a Bara situate in village Lohgarh alias Fidde, in district Ropar. On his death his daughter Smt. Raksha Rani filed a suit for possession of this property claiming to be the sole heir of the deceased. The suit was opposed by Ram Lal defendant, nephew of the deceased, on the plea that the property in dispute had been bequeathed in his favour by the deceased on the basis of a registered will dt. 12th April, 1978. Some other objections were also taken regarding the maintainability of the suit. On the pleadings of the parties a number of issues were framed by the learned trial Court. Statements of two witnesses of the defendant Ram Lal were recorded by the trial Court on 29th Jan. 1981. At that stage Smt. Raksha Rani and Ram Lal arrived at a settlement and their statements were recorded which were signed by them. The statement made by the defendant Ram Lal is as follows :-

"My will Exhibit D-1 has been accepted to be correct by the plaintiff. Since we are brother and sister, therefore, the land which I have inher





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top