SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(P&H) 88

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
State Of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Vishwajit Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. Briefly the case of the petitioner is that Smt. Parbati Kaur widow of late Arjan Singh of Kapurthala executed a will dt. 21st July, 1956 at Indore bequeathing all her property for the benefit of general public in favour of Randhir Jagatjit Hospital, Kapurthala (hereinafter referred to as the Hospital ) and appointed Jagan Nath Paul of Jalandhar as the sole executor of the will. She died at Indore on 15th Aug. 1956. Jagan Nath Paul refused to act as executor on account of his age. Consequently a petition has been filed by the State through the Chief Medical Officer, Kapurthala for grant of Letters of Administration on the basis of the will.

2. The petition has been contested by Vishwajit Singh respondent No. 1, Sehdev Singh respondent No. 2 and Atam Dev Singh respondent No. 3. Vishwajit Singh, in his written statement, pleaded that Smt. Parbati Kaur did not execute any will in favour of the Hospital as alleged. She was not of sound and disposing mind on the date when the will is alleged to have been executed by her. The will is also invalid as she was limited owner of the property and could not dispose it of by a will. Consequently the petitioner is not entitled to get Le

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top