SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(P&H) 24

PREM CHAND JAIN, S.S.KANG, I.S.TIWANA
Bishamber Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

SUKHDEV SINGH KANG, J.

1. Can a Gram Panchayat transfer a portion of the Shamilat land under a street or a lane within the abadi deh or gora deh vested in it under S.4 read with S.2(g)(4) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 , or change its user? is the prestinely legal issue raised in this writ petition. A reference to salient facts is a prefactory necessity.

2. Bishamber Dayal, petitioner, and six others residents of village Jainpur, Tehsil and District Sonepat, filed an application under S.7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands Regulation) Act, 1961, (hereinafter called the Act ) against Smt. Ashi and 15 other residents and Gram Panchayat of their village and pleaded that land measuring 3 Kanals 19 Marlas, comprised in Khasra No. 166 Khewat No. 357/358-Khatauni No.514-min, was a thoroughfare connecting the abadi of the village with the phirni. Fifteen/twenty days prior to the filing of the application, the respondents 1 to 6 encroached upon a portion of this thoroughfare and constructed one room and a boundary wall. Similarly, respondents 7 to 16 obstructed the thoroughfare by constructing a room and thus encroached upon six karams of the thoroughfare.





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top