SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 551

S.P.GOYAL, G.C.MITTAL
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Maya Ram Jia Lal – Respondent


Judgment

Gokal Chand Mital, J.

1. M/s. Maya Ram Jia Lal (hereinafter referred to as the "assessee") carries on business in the sale of wool-tops and manufacture of yarn. During the course of the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1969-70, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee paid a sum of Rs. 62,060 to various parties as compensation for non-fulfilling contracts to supply goods to them. The Income-tax Officer came to the conclusion that since there was no written agreement between the parties, the compensation paid for non-fulfilment of the contracts was treated as speculative in nature and was disallowed. On appeal, the assessee furnished before the Appellate Assistant Commissioner the following details regarding the claim of Rs. 62,060.

Name of the party Date of Contract Quantity Contracted Date and Payment of advance received Date of Payment of compensation Amount Paid Rate at Which Paid


Rs. Rs.

M/s. Jay Udhay Hosiery, Madhopuri , Ludhiana15-5-686,000 Kg.17-5-68 _______

1,00010-3-6919,5003-25

M/s. Mammal Sant Lal, Chaura Bazar, Ludhiana1-6-683,500 Lb.5-6-60 _______

3,000 10-3-692,8351-00

M/s. Surinder Kumar Jain &























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top