PRITPAL SINGH
Darya Singh – Appellant
Versus
Collector, District Bhiwani – Respondent
1. The petitioner Darya Singh applied, under S.8 of the Haryana Relief of Agricultural Indebtedness Act, 1976 (hereinafter called the Act ) against Gillu Ram, respondent No. 3, for settlement of debt of Rs.1400/- and interest thereon. The Debt Settlement Officer, Charkhi Dadri, holding that Gillu Ram s annual income exceed Rs.2500/-, passed a decree against him and in favour of the petitioner Darya Singh for Rs.1400/- as principal amount and Rs.434/- as interest, total decretal amount being Rs.1834/-. A copy of the order of the Debt Settlement Officer is Annexure-P.1. Gillu Ram filed an appeal under S.14(2) of the Act which was heard by the Collector, Bhiwani. The Collector held that the amount of debt should have been first got determined from a civil Court by Darya Singh and only thereafter he could have applied under S.8 of the Act. On this finding the order of the Debt Settlement Officer (Annexure P.1) was held to be without jurisdiction and it was set aside. A copy of the order of the appellate Court is annexure P.2.
2. In this writ petition Darya Singh has challenged the validity of the appellate order (Annexure P.2) and has prayed that this order be quashed.
3. On he
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.