1. Harbans Singh respondent entered into an agreement dt. March, 25, 1982 with Smt. Dalip Kaur petitioner No. 1 whereby the latter agreed to sell the land measuring 30 kanals, 9 marlas for consideration of Rs. 55,000.00 . He filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining her from alienating the said land in which a consent decree was passed on Jan., 21, 1983. In spite thereof petitioner No. 1 sold the land and executed sale deed in favour of petitioner No. 2 on Aug., 4, 1983. When the deed was presented to the Sub-Registrar for registration, Harbans Singh appeared there and apprised him of the decree. Still the deed was registered. So he moved the present application for execution of the decree and for taking contempt proceedings. Respondents Nos.1 and 6 only seem to have filed their replies who admitted the factum of the sale but denied the existence and knowledge of the alleged decree. The Executing Court exonerated respondents Nos.3 to 5 and 7; holding respondents Nos.1, 2 and 6 (now petitioners Nos. 1, 2 and 6) guilty of the disobedience of the decree, set aside the sale and ordered the attachment of the salary of petitioner No. 6 and attachment of the suit land as w