SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(P&H) 333

D.V.SEHGAL
Maya Devi And Others – Appellant
Versus
Mehria Gram Dall Mill, Hissar – Respondent


Judgment

1. This regular second appeal is directed against the judgement and decree dated 21-4-1986 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hissar, affirming in appeal the judgement and decree dt./-21-3-1986 passed by the learned Sub Judge 1st Class, Hissar whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 was decreed ex parte holding that it is entitled to the restoration of possession of the property mentioned in the heading of the plaint and ordering restoration accordingly and further restraining the defendants from dispossessing it from the premises in dispute without following the due course of law.

2. The facts in brief are that respondent No. 1 through its proprietor Harbans Lal Aggrawal filed a suit on 5-6-1981 for permanent injunction restraining defendants Nos. 1 to 5 (who are appellants Nos. 2 to 4 and respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in the present appeal) from taking forcible possession of the Dal Factory including machinery and Dal Plant situated at Balasmand Road, Hissar, without due process of law. The boundaries and the location of the factory were described in the plaint which are not in dispute. Respondent No. 1 alleged that it is in possession of the fac

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top