SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 474

PRITPAL SINGH
Nachhattar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harcharan Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

1. A petition under S.13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 , (hereinafter called the Act ) for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce was presented by Nachhattar Singh and his wife Harcharan Kaur together on the ground that they have mutually agreed that the marriage should be dissolved. This petition was filed on July 24, 1984. The trial Court adjourned the petition to Jan. 28, 1985. in view of sub-sec.(2) of S.13B of the Act which envisages that the marriage can be dissolved in such proceedings not earlier than six months and not later than eighteen months after the date of the presentation of the petition. On Jan. 28, 1985 the case was adjourned to Feb. 6, 1985. On the adjourned date of hearing i.e. on Feb. 6, 1985 the wife Harcharan Kaur made a statement that the petition be filed. Consequent upon this statement the trial Court dismissed the petition on the ground that one of the parties is not willing to the dissolution of marriage by mutual consent. The husband Nachhattar Singh has filed the present appeal against this order.

2. The impugned order suffers from legal infirmity and is, therefore, unsustainable. Sub-sec. (2) of S.13B of the Act is in the following



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top