SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 420

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
Onkar Nath – Appellant
Versus
Basheer – Respondent


Judgment

1. This revision petition has been filed by the defendants against the order of the Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Ajnala dt. 23rd Sept. 1977.

2. Briefly the facts are that the defendant-petitioners were the owners of the land in dispute. They entered into agreement dated 8th Feb., 1974 with the plaintiff-respondents for sale of the land for a consideration of Rs.20,400/-. They received an amount of Rs.3,000/- as earnest money at the time of agreement. The sale deed was to be executed on or before 10th December. 1974. The balance amount of Rs.17,400/- was to be paid to them at the time of the execution of the sale deed. The sale deed was not executed according to the agreement. Consequently the plaintiffs instituted a suit for possession through specific performance on payment of Rs.17,400/-. It was contested by the petitioners inter alia on the ground that the plaintiffs were responsible for breach of the agreement.

3. The trial Court did not accept the version of the defendants and decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiffs on 9th Nov., 1976. It was provided in the decree that the defendants would execute the sale deed within a period of one month in accordance with the a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top