SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 421

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
S.S.Sodhi, J.
Unnati And Others
Versus
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala
First Appeal First Order No. 467 of 1981,
Decided On : AUGUST 24, 1985

Gratuitous services rendered by the mother have a monetary value and compensation is payable to the children and husband.

Headnote:

MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT - COMPENSATION - LOSS OF SERVICES OF MOTHER - FINANCIAL LOSS - INCOME FROM SHARES - COMPENSATION PAYABLE IN RESPECT OF DEATH OF FATHER - MULTIPLIERS - INTEREST - LIABILITY OF RESPONDENTS - ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

Fact of the Case:

Unnati, an eight-month-old girl, lost both her parents in a car accident caused by the rash and negligent driving of a Pepsu Road Transport Corporation bus driver. The Tribunal awarded compensation for the father's death but denied compensation for the mother's death, holding that the claimant suffered no loss.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Tribunal erred in denying compensation for the loss of the mother's services, as gratuitous services rendered by the mother have a monetary value and compensation is payable to the children and husband. The court also held that the claimant was entitled to compensation for the financial loss suffered due to the loss of her mother's income from shares in two firms.

Issues: 1. Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for the loss of her mother's services? 2. Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for the financial loss suffered due to the loss of her mother's income from shares? 3. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the father is adequate?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that there is a monetary value to be attributed to the loss of the services of the mother for which the children are entitled to compensation, even though such services were rendered gratuitously. The extent of such loss would depend upon the peculiar circumstances of the deceased and the claimants, but would generally be the cost of replacement of such services. 2. The court held that the claimant was entitled to compensation for the financial loss suffered due to the loss of her mother's income from shares in two firms. However, the court held that the claimant would start receiving the income which was accruing to her mother during her lifetime upon the death of the mother, and therefore, there was no loss for which compensation could be justified. 3. The court held that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the death of the father was adequate, considering the young age of both the mother and father and the possibility of having other children in the future.

Final Decision: The court enhanced the compensation payable to the claimant to Rs.2,50,000/- (Two lacs and fifty thousand only), with interest at the rate of 12 percent per annum from the date of the application to the date of payment.

Judgment

1. The claim in appeal here is for enhanced compensation, the claimant being Unnati, an eight month old girl, who lost both her parents, her father Shakti Malhotra and her mother Poonam Malhotra when their car met with an accident with a Pepsu Road Transport Corporation Bus. This happened on July 5, 1980 on the Morinda-Kharar Road.

2. It was the finding of the Tribunal that the accident had been caused entirely due to the rash and negligent driving of the bus-driver. A sum of Rs.52,800/- was awarded as compensation on account of the death of the father. As regards the mother, it was held that the claimant had suffered no loss and compensation was consequently declined.

3. It is now well settled that there is indeed a monetary value to be attributed to the loss of the services of the mother for which the children are entitled to compensation, even though such services were rendered gratuitously. The extent of such loss would depend upon the peculiar circumstances of the deceased and the claimants, but would generally be the cost of replacement of such services. As is well known, there are various services that a mother provides in the house. both for the husband as also her children. To begin with, she is the house-keeper who sees to their board and lodging and furnishings of the house. Besides this, she also has her role in saving upon the expenses of the children s clothes and their schooling and above all she affords that element of security, so essential both to the children and the husband in times of ill-health and also on occasions when the husband may be unemployed. If the wife happens to be gainfully employed, this would constitute another important loss. In determining the loss suffered by the husband, children or both, all these factors have to be kept in view. In other words, even gratuitous services rendered by the mother have a monetary value and compensation in respect thereof is payable to the children and husband The Tribunal thus clearly fell in error here in denying compensation to the claimant for the loss of the services of her mother.

4. Considering that the claimant was less, than a year old when her mother died, it is obvious that if this unfortunate accident had not taken place, the claimant would have had her mother look after her for many years to come, certainly until she was married. Seen in the context of the status and position of the claimant s parents and what she could consequently be expected to have aimed at in life, the loss on account of her mother s services clearly deserves to be assessed at Rs.50,000/-.

5. Compensation was also sought on the financial aspect accruing on account of her mothers death. The reference here being to the" income derived by the mother from the shares held by her in the two firms, Dynamic Services India Private Limited and Pioneer Communications. The evidence on record shows that Poonam Malhotra had 25 per cent share in Dynamic Services India Private Limited and 20 per cent in Pioneer Communications. The income of the deceased from her holdings in these firms was to the tune of about Rs.6,000/- per annum. Mr. V.P. Gandhi sought to contend that keeping in view the income of her deceased husband, this entire amount of Rs.6,000/- per annum, deserves to be assessed as the financial loss suffered by the claimant. Though attractive on the face of it, this position cannot be accepted as it must be borne in mind that upon the death of the mother Poonam Malhotra, her share in both these firms would come to the claimant and consequently she would start receiving the income which was accruing to her mother during her lifetime. So considered, there is no loss of the claimant here for which compensation can be justified.

6. Turning now to the compensation payable in respect of the death of the father, it is no doubt true that the claimant was the only child of her parents, considering, however, the young age of both the mother and father, it must be taken into reckoni



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top