SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 189

M.M.PUNCHHI
Iqbal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

1. This petition under Sec. 482, Cr.P.C. has arisen in the following manner. The parties to the dispute are the progeny of Sher Singh. Whereas the petitioner is the son of Sher Singh, respondents Nos. 2 to 5 are his daughters/grand-daughters. The estate of Sher Singh comprising agricultural lands and kothas and a tube well etc, situate thereon, gave rise to a dispute between the parties after the death of Sher Singh. The estate of Sher Singh was mutated by the Revenue Officer between the petitioner and respondents Nos. 2 to 5 in equal shares vide order dated 31-1-1983. The petitioner then filed a suit praying that he was the sole legal heir of the property in question and that the order of the Revenue Officer dated 31-1-1983 was illegal, null and void and not binding on the petitioner. He also filed an application for interim injunction under O. 39. Rr.1 and 2 of the Civil P.C., praying for the grant of interim injunction restraining the contesting respondents from alienating the suit property and disturbing the possession of the petitioner. Ad interim injunction was granted to the petitioner on 28-3-1984 in the presence of the parties. Respondents Nos. 2 to 5 preferred an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top