SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 95

B.S.YADAV
Pritam Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Chanan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

B.S.Yadav, J.

1. The facts giving rise to this appeal are that Ujjagar Singh was owner of the suit land measuring 193 Kanals 10 Marlas situated in village Aulakh, Tehsildar Batala. He died on 23rd May, 1967 leaving behind his widow Pritam Kaur (plaintiff No. 1), two daughters named Chhiboo and Chhindo (plaintiff Nos. 2 and 3 respectively) and 3 sons, namely Chanan Singh, Atma Singh and Phuman Singh (defendant Nos. 1 to 3 respectively). After his death mutation Exhibit D. 2 in respect of his inheritance was entered on 26th July, 1967 by the Patwari in favour of his 3 sons and eventually the Revenue Officer sanctioned it on 10th December, 1970 on the basis of a Will. The plaintiffs filed the present suit on 3rd September, 1974 for possession of half-share in the above land on the ground that they were entitled to that share in the inheritance of Ujjagar Singh being his heirs. They further alleged that the Will propounded by the defendant was a forged, fictious and bogus document.

2. Only defendant Nos. 1 and 2 contested the suit. They admitted the relationship of the plaintiffs with Ujjagar Singh deceased but pleaded that the deceased had executed a valid Will in favour of th





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top