SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(P&H) 48

K.P.S.SANDHU
Murari Lal And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Income-tax Officer "a" Ward – Respondent


Judgment

K.P.S.Sandhu, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, filed by Murari Lal, Mangey Ram, Mahabir Parshad and Ballu Ram, partners of a firm, Messrs Mohinder Pal Ajay Kumar, Timber Merchants, Kath Mandi, Hissar, praying therein that the complaint dated March, 31, 1983, filed under Section 276C of the I.T. Act, 1961, by the ITO, Hissar (annexure P-4 to this petition), and the proceedings taken thereon be quashed.

2. The facts which gave rise to this petition are that petitioner No. 5, the firm Messrs Mohinder Pal Ajay Kumar, Timber Merchants, Kath Mandi, Hissar, is an income-tax assessee and is being assessed to income-tax by the ITO, A-Ward, Hissar. On August 31, 1981, the firm, Messrs Mohinder Pal Ajay Kumar, filed a return of income dated August 31, 1981, along with the copies of statement of accounts, i.e., statutory income chart, profit and loss account, statement of partners account, balance-sheet, etc., for the assessment year 1981-82, relevant to the accounting year 1980-81, declaring an income of Rs. 75,224. The return was signed and verified by Murari Lal, the petitioner. He also put his signature on the statement of accounts




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top