SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 150

NIRMAL SINGH, V.K.BALI
Sanjay – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Nirmal Singh, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order 12/14-2-2003 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, vide which he was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 3000.00 . In default of payment of fine, he was further sentenced to undergo R. I. for nine months under Section 302, IPC. He was also convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for four years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000.00 . In default of payment of fine, he was directed to undergo R. I. for six months under Section 328, IPC. However, both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 14-1-1999 at about 8.30 p.m. Sada Ram and his brother Prithvi were watching television. Wife of Sada Ram told him that Babli, his daughter, had gone to tie the he-calf and had not returned. Sada Ram searched for Babli here and there. Then he heard a noise from the roof. He went there and saw that Sanjay had gagged the mouth of Babli with his hand while she was trying to free herself. Sada Ram got released Babli from the clutches of Sanjay. In the meantime, Prithvi also came there. Sanjay ran away from th



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top