SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 1319

HEMANT GUPTA
Lachman Dass – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Hemant Gupta, J.

1. The defendant is in revision petition aggrieved against the order passed by the Courts below whereby application for setting aside of ex parte decree was dismissed.

2. In a suit for recovery filed on behalf of the plaintiff, the defendant put in appearance through his Advocate on 15.05.1995 after filing power of attorney and sought time to file written statement. Time was granted to the defendant to file written statement again on 12.6.1995. Subsequently, on 21.07.1995 adjournment was sought as written statement could not be filed. Adjournment requested was granted on payment of Rs. 50/-as costs. On 11.8.1995, costs were paid but written statement still was not filed and time was granted on payment of Rs. 100/- as costs. On the next date i.e. 5-9-1995, neither written statement was filed nor costs were paid but learned Counsel for the defendant made a statement that he has no instructions. Since the defendant was not present, he was proceeded against ex parte. The case was adjourned for ex parte evidence on 23.9.1995. Subsequently, ex parte decree was passed on 2.11.1995. The present petitioner moved an application for setting aside ex parte decree on 25























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top