Satish Kumar Mittal, J.

1. Petitioner Ramesh alias Meshu, who is undisputedly a juvenile, has filed this criminal revision against the orders dated 2.7.2004 and 12.8.2004 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Sonepat and Addl. Sessions Judge, Sopepat, respectively vide which bail has been declined to him in case FIR No. 42 dated 27.3.2004 under Sections 323, 376, 452, 506 and 325 IPC registered at Police Station Murthal, District Sonepat. In this case, the aforesaid FIR has been lodged by one Smt. Roshni, a married lady of 35 years of age, alleging therein that she was forcibly raped by 4/5 persons including the petitioner in her house at 1.30 A.M. on 27.3.2004.

2. Counsel for the petitioner contends that in the medico-legal report, it was initially stated by the complainant that she had suffered injuries in an assault in the village. At the time of her medico-legal examination, she did not state the fact regarding committing rape on her by 4/5 persons nor any medical examination in this regard was conducted. Subsequently, on the next date, an application was moved for her examination on the allegations of rape. Counsel further contends that during investigation, it was fou