SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(P&H) 1003

HEMANT GUPTA
Illyas – Appellant
Versus
Tarlok Chand – Respondent


Judgment

1. The plaintiffs are in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the first Appellate Court whereby suit for declaration and for permanent injunction was dismissed in appeal.

2. The plaintiffs have sought declaration inter-alia on the ground that they are entered as mortgagees with possession with respect to the agricultural land measuring 28 Kanals 13 marlas as detailed in the plaint. An area measuring 14 Kanals 15 marlas, i.e. 2338/4516th share in the land measuring 27 kanals 13 marlas has been auctioned by defendants No. 1 to 4 in favour of the defendant No. 5 on 16-1-1991. The custodian has wrongly been entered as mortgagors of the said share in the suit land. The plaintiffs are also having some share in the suit land but are recorded as mortgagees of the entire land for times immemorial for the last more than 100 years. Some of the Muslims became evacuees and the share of the said co-sharers came to vest in the custodian and the said share is 2338/4516.

3. In the written statement filed on behalf of defendants No. 1 to 4 it was the stand of the defendants that the suit was mortgaged by the predecessor-in-interest of muslim evacuees vide mutatio

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top