1996 Supreme(P&H) 300
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
T.H.B.Chalapathi, J.
Sukhmender Singh
Versus
Dialpura Mirza
Civil Writ Petition No. 10387 of 1995,
Decided On : FEBRUARY 15, 1996
A nomination paper can be rejected only if it is shown that a candidate seeking election is not eligible to contest the election.
Headnote:
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY - ELECTION - NOMINATION PAPER - REJECTION - GROUNDS - VALIDITY - PUNJAB CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1961 - PUNJAB CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES, 1963 - APPENDIX C, RULE 6.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners challenged the election of the Managing Committee of Dialpur Mirza Co-operative Agriculture Service Society Limited (Society) on the ground that the rejection of the nomination paper of the 1st petitioner was illegal. The Deputy Registrar upheld the election, but the Joint Registrar set it aside and directed a fresh election. The Joint Secretary, Co-operation (Appeals) upheld the Deputy Registrar's order.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the rejection of the nomination paper of the 1st petitioner was illegal and without any foundation or basis. The election held on the basis of illegal rejection of nomination papers is liable to be set aside.
Issues: Whether the nomination paper of the 1st petitioner was validly rejected at the time of scrutiny by the Returning Officer.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that a nomination paper can be rejected only if it is shown that a candidate seeking election is not eligible to contest the election. The reason given by the Returning Officer for rejecting the nomination papers of the 1st petitioner, that he had mentioned a wrong account number, was not supported by any of the rules. The rules do not provide that if a person has given a wrong account number in his nomination papers, his nomination paper is liable to be rejected.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the orders of the Deputy Registrar and the Joint Secretary, Co-operation (Appeals), and quashed the election held on 28.7.1993. The Returning Officer was directed to hold fresh election within three months.
T.H.B.Chalapathi, J.
1. This writ petition is filed invoking the certiorarial jurisdiction of this Court to quash the orders of respondents No. 12 and 13 upholding the election of the Managing Committee of Dialpur Mirza Co-operative Agriculture Service Society Limited (Hereinafter referred to as the Society). The petitioners are the members of the said society. The elections of the management committee of the said society were held on 28.7.1993 and the election programme was issued on 20.7.1993. The Ist petitioner filed his nomination paper for election as a member of the Managing Committee of the aforesaid Society. His nomination paper was rejected by the Returning Officer on the ground that the correct Khata No. (account No.) was not given in the nomination paper. The 2nd petitioner is also a member of the said society. After rejecting the nomination paper of the Ist Petitioner, the elections took place and respondents 3 to 11 were elected as Members of the managing Committee. Challenging the election of the Members of the Managing Committee, the petitioners filed an election petition before the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bhathinda, Under Sections 55 and 56 of the Punjab Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 . In their election petition, they challenged the election on the ground that the rejection of the nomination paper of the Ist petitioner was illegal. They also took certain other grounds namely that the nomination papers of Ramji Singh and other candidates were illegally accepted by the Returning Officer and notice of 15 days was also not given prior to holding the election. The Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, by his order dated 18.1.1994 held that the rejection of the nomination paper of the Ist petitioner was valid and that the elections were held in accordance with the Rules and accordingly rejected the election petition. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioners filed an appeal before the Joint Registrar, Ferozepur Division, Ferozepur, who by his order dated 16.6.1994 held that the rejection of the nomination paper of Sukhminder Singh was made without giving an opportunity to him and accordingly set aside the election of the society held on 28.7.1993 and directed the fresh election to be held within a period of two months. Against the said order of the Joint Registrar three members who have been elected in the election held on 28.7.1993 filed a Revision petition before the Joint Secretary, Co-operation (Appeals) Punjab, who by his order dated 27.1.1995 allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the Joint Registrar dated 16.6.1994 and upheld the order of the Deputy Registrar dated 18.1.1994 whereby he upheld the election of the Managing Committee of the said Society.
2. Challenging this order of the Joint Secretary, Co-operation (Appeals) Punjab, confirming the order of the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies dated 18.1.1994, the petitioner filed this writ petition.
3. There is no dispute that the Ist petitioner is a Member of the Society. There is also no dispute that he has filed his nomination paper within the time. The nomination paper of the Ist petitioner-Sukhminder Singh has been rejected by the Returning Officer on 28.7.1993 on the ground that he has mentioned account No. 339, whereas the correct khata (account Number) is 399; That is the sole ground on which the nomination-paper of the Ist petitioner was rejected. The only point that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the nomination- paper of the Ist petitioner was validly rejected at the time of scrutiny by the Returning Officer. In this context, it is useful to refer to Rules relating to the election of the Co-operative Societies. Appendix C of the Punjab Co-operative Societies Rules, 1963 deals with the elections of the Co-operative Societies. The Appendix C has been incorporated in pursuance of Rule 23 of the Punjab Cooperative Societies Rules, 1963, according to which the members of