SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 302

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
V.K.Bali and K.S.Kumaran JJ.
State Of Punjab
Versus
Baldev Singh
Criminal Revision No. 675 of 1992,
Criminal Appeal No. 475 of 1992,
Decided On : FEBRUARY 15, 1996

Where the prosecution has not come up with the complete truth and the injuries on the person of the accused remained unexplained, the benefit of doubt should be given to the accused.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - SECTION 307, 326, 324 AND 323 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE - ACQUITTAL - EVIDENCE - INJURIES ON THE PERSON OF ACCUSED REMAINED UNEXPLAINED - BENEFIT OF DOUBT - GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

Dilbag Singh and his brother Bakhtawar Singh were injured by Harjinder Singh, Baldev Singh, Swaran Singh, and Satnam Singh. Dilbag Singh lodged an FIR, stating that the accused attacked them with gandasis while hurling abuses. Swaran Singh, one of the accused, sustained five injuries, one of which was grievous. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding that the prosecution had not come up with the complete truth and that the injuries on Swaran Singh remained unexplained.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal, finding that the prosecution had not come up with the complete truth and that the injuries on Swaran Singh remained unexplained. The court held that no implicit faith could be placed upon the story propounded by the prosecution and that in itself was enough to give the benefit of doubt to the respondents.

Issues: Whether the prosecution had come up with the complete truth.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution had not come up with the complete truth and that the injuries on Swaran Singh remained unexplained. The court held that no implicit faith could be placed upon the story propounded by the prosecution and that in itself was enough to give the benefit of doubt to the respondents.

Final Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal and revision, upholding the trial court's acquittal of the accused.

Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. Whereas, State of Punjab has filed Criminal Appeal No. 475-DBA of 1992 against the respondents, Baldev Singh and three others, challenging the order of their acquittal under Sections 307, 326, 324 and 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar, vide judgment dated March 27, 1992, Bakhtawar Singh, complainant also seeks the same result from Criminal Revision No. 675 of 1992 preferred by him which was ordered to be listed with Criminal Appeal No. 475- DBA of 1992 filed by the State of Punjab. By this order, thus, we shall dispose of both the appeal and revision, mentioned above.

2. Brief facts of the case reveal that Dilbag Singh and his brother Bakhtawar Singh were injured by Harjinder Singh, Baldev Singh, Swaran Singh and Satnam Singh on September 7, 1987 at 8 a.m. in village Sahlon, which is stated to be seven miles away from Police Station Nawan Sahar. The FIR with regard to this incident was lodged by PW-1 Dilbag Singh on September 7, 1987 at 6.10 p.m. Statement of Dilbag Singh was recorded by ASI Jarnail Singh of Police Station Nawan Sahar, wherein he stated that he was resident of village Sahlon and was pensioner from the Army. He was cultivating his own land. His brother Bakhtawar Singh, who lived separately, was also doing cultivation in the village. His house adjoined the house of Baldev Singh Sarpanch. On the eventful day at about 8 a.m., he was standing at the threshold of his house when he heard a noise. He came out in the street and saw that Baldev Singh Sarpanch, armed with Gandasi, Swaran Singh, armed with Gandasi, Harjinder Singh, armed with Gandasi and Satnam Singh, armed with Gandasi were standing in front of the house of his brother Bakhtawar Singh and were hurling abuses at him. Bakhtawar Singh was making entreaties to them. He stepped forward when Baldev Singh raised lalkara saying "Catch hold of them, do not let them go because they were acquitted in the case previously". Upon that, Swaran Singh gave a Gandasi blow on the head of his brother Bakhtawar Singh, who while making the noise of not to beat him, fell down. He stepped forward to rescue his brother while raising the noise when Satnam Singh gave a Gandasi blow to him which hit him on the front side of fore-head. Baldev Singh gave another Gandasi blow to him which hit him again on his fore-head. Harjinder Singh gave two Gandasi blows from its reverse side to him, one of which hit him on his fore-head and the other on his left shoulder blade, as a result of which he also fell down. On hearing the noise, his brother Bachhittar Singh and Dial Singh son of Ram Kishan, also reached the spot. They also raised an alarm and witnessed the occurrence. The assailants ran away with their respective weapons while hurling abuses and threatening. After making arrangement of conveyance, his brother Bachhittar Singh got him and Bakhtawar Singh admitted in an injured condition in Civil Hospital, Nawan Sahar. The doctor there referred his brother Bakhtawar Singh to Jalandhar for treatment. The cause of quarrel was that previously they were acquitted in a criminal case whereas a case was still going on against them in the Court. It is because of this grudge entertained by the accused that they had inflicted injuries to him as also to his brother Bakhtawar Singh.

3. Dr. Rattan Kalsi, ESI Hospital, Jalandhar had medico-legally examined Bakhtawar Singh son of Hazara Singh on September 7, 1989 at 12.30 p.m. and found following injury on his person :-

"An incised wound running anterior posterior region 5 cms from the sagittal suture, in the front parito region, on the right side, measuring 7 x 1 x 1 cms. under lying bone cut. Fresh bleeding was evident. Advised x-ray".

The witness also stated that injury on the person of Bakhtawar Singh was dangerous to life as declared by Surgical Specialist.

4 Dr. Sat Pal Banga, PW-4 had medically examined Dilbag Singh on September 7, 1987 at 10.35 a.m. a
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top