SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(P&H) 126

K.S.KUMARAN, V.K.BALI
Hardeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

V.K.Bali, J.

1. The appellants, Hardeep Singh, his father Inder Singh and mother Baljit Kaur, have filed the instant appeal challenging the order of conviction and sentence recorded against them by the Sessions Judge, Ferozepur, vide his judgment dated October 6, 1994, who held that the prosecution had been able to prove its case against Hardeep Singh accused for an offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and against Inder Singh and Baljit Kaur accused for an offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code against all the three accused-appellants herein. They were held guilty as such and whereas, Hardeep Singh was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default whereof to further undergo RI for six months under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Inder Singh and Baljit Kaur were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life each and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default whereof to further undergo RI for six months each under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC. All the appellants were further sentenced to undergo imprisonment










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top