SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 1350

T.H.B.CHALAPATHI, G.S.SINGHVI
Gordhan Singh Gulia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JudgmentJudgment

G.S.Singhvi, J.

1. Petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order (Annexure P-3) and also for quashing of the condition incorporated in the order (Annexure P-l) for automatic termination of his service.

2. On the basis of requisition sent to the Employment Exchange by the respondent No. 2, the petitioner, who is an ex-serviceman, was called for interview along with other eligible candidates, he was selected by the respondent No. 2 and was appointed as Machine Grinder Instructor in the pay-scale of Rs.1400-2600 on purely ad hoc basis for a maximum period ending on 30.6.1995 with a condition that he would stand relieved on the expiry of the term specified in the order of appointment. The petitioner joined duty on 30.3.1995 but on the basis of condition incorporated in the order of appointment, the petitioner was relieved from the service by the Principal, Industrial Training Institute, Rbhtak, on 29.6.1995.

3. The case of the petitioner is that incorporation of the condition for termination of service w.e.f. 30.6.1995 is in itself arbitrary and unconstitutional and the action of the respondents in bringing about an end his employment notwithstanding the availability









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top