V. S. Aggarwal, J.

1. Since common questions are involved, therefore, all the three criminal revisions can be disposed of together.

2. The relevant facts are that petitioner Ms. Anita filed a complaint against the respondents asserting that respondent Anil K. Mehra as partner of the firm Ms. Mehra Enterprises, of which respondents 2 and 3 are also partners, issued ten cheques for Rs.2066.66 paisa each in her favour. They had been drawn on the Central Bank of India. Sector 22-C, Ghandigarh to the discharge the debt of Rs.20666.60 paise on account of the loan advanced. The details of the cheques and their numbers had been given in the complaint. The cheques had been presented for encashment and were received back with the remarks exceeds arrangements. A notice was issued to the firm calling upon it to pay the amount of cheques within 15 days. It was received on 22.4.1989 but the payment was not made. Instead a reply was sent. The learned Judicial Magistrate summoned the respondents as accused persons.

3. On identical facts petitioner Santosh Kumari preferred another criminal complaint with respect to the offence under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Herein nine che