SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 1100

SWATANTER KUMAR
Chamkaur Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Swatanter Kumar, J.

1. By this order I propose to deal with the application for bail filed by one Chamkaur Singh. A case under Sections 302/307/427/447/148/149/323/324/325 Indian Penal Code and 25/54/59 Arms Act was registered against eleven persons including the petitioner in F.I.R. No. 74 dated 13.11.1994.

2. The petitioner who is stated to be a student of 10+1 in Ripudaman Government College, Nabha, is alleged to have been falsely implicated in this case on account of party faction. The petitioner is stated to be in custody for the last more than 7-1/2 months. The challan has been filed but the trial has not as yet started. The learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that even as per FIR the accused party was already present in the field which is owned and possessed by them and it is the complainant party who wanted to disturb their possesin and they adopted illegal methods for the same and as such the complainant party was aggressor. According to the learned counsel there are cross cases i.e. a case under sections 307/427/448/148/149 Indian Penal Code and 25/54/59 of the Arms Act have been registered against the complainant party and they are also facing trial. Le






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top