SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(P&H) 534

N.K.SODHI
Surinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Lakhbir Singh – Respondent


Judgment

N.K.Sodhi, J.

1. Sat Pal deceased met with a fatal accident while travelling in the offending truck driven by Lakhbir Singh respondent No. 1. The heirs of the deceased who are now appellants filed claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for award of compensation and one of the issues framed was "Whether the accident was caused due to the rash and negligent driving by Lakhbir Singh respondent No. 1". The trial Court dismissed the claim application holding that there was no evidence on the record to show that the truck was being driven rashly or negligently by respondent No.1. The appellants have filed the present first appeal which stands admitted. The prayer made in the application is for the award of Rs. 50,000/- on account of "no fault liability" under Section 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act. Notice of this application was issued to the respondents who have not filed any reply. Since the accident in the present case stands admitted, I am of the opinion that the owner and Insurance Company are both jointly and severally liable to pay an amount of Rs. 25,000/- to the claimants under Section 140 of the Act.

2. Mr. Mahajan learned counsel for the appellants sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top