SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 469

V.RAMASWAMI
Commissioner Of Income-tax – Appellant
Versus
Justice P. C. Jain. – Respondent


Judgment

V. RAMASWAMI, J.

1. These two references (Income-tax Reference No. 51 of 1978 and Income-tax Reference No. 168 of 1980) under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relate to the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76, respectively. In the first reference, the following two questions of law have been referred by the Tribunal :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the word income used in the penultimate line of the second proviso to section 23(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, means annual letting value ?"

"2. If the answer to the above question is in the affirmative, whether the Tribunal was right in law in allowing loss which exceeded the annual letting value from the house property by Rs. 2,089 after allowing deduction of Rs. 1,200 under section 23(1) of the Act ?"

2. In the reference relating to the assessment year 1975-76, one compendious question has been referred through the point involved in the same and that question reads as follows :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal erred in law in allowing a loss of Rs. 1,000 representing loss from a newly constructe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top