SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 489

HARBANS SINGH RAI
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Judgment

Harbans Singh Rai, J.

1. Arun Kumar appellant was convicted by Shri A.S. Sodhi, Additional Sessions Judge, Faridkot, under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3-1/2 years and a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for six months. He was also convicted under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Feeling aggrieved he has filed this appeal.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 4.9.1985, Moti Ram made a complaint to Assistant Sub Inspector Gurdit Singh that he was residing in Soodanwali Gali, near Civil Hospital, Moga and Arun Kumar appellant was his neighbour. Arun Kumar was in the habit of taking liquor and raising catcalls. On 3.9.1985, at about 9 or 10.00 p.m. Arun Kumar came in front of the house of Moti Ram and raised catcalls. Moti Ram protested and complained to Arun Kumars father. The appellant felt offended.

3. On 4.9.1985 at about 4.00 p.m. Moti Ram was present in his house and was talking to his brother Kanwar Bhan who had come from Delhi. Subhash Chander was al








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top